Hi Ulf
Quote:zeiss and wigam - I'd like to know what side you'd prefer play - especially if any of you would be willing to shoulder the role of C MKG (Commander Military Command Gotland)...
Wigam Commander Military Command Gotland....I like the sound of that. has a sort of ring to it.:) Now i just await gary's reply.;) So Ulf if you need me i will take the command of Gotland.
Obviously the swedes are it for me.
Me too!! Me Too!!! ME TOO!!!!!
I should be done with the remodeling thingie in another couple of weeks, so I'll be ready, willing and able. I don't care which side I play, although When the Marines (NATO Strategic reserve was the USMC, so they would have been tasked with helping the Swedes. Primary misson, rescue the Bikini Team from the clutches of the Slavs) land, I would like to command them. :cool:
I'd like to join in for the Swedes.
For the morning already there are two commanders for the Soviet army: Borogonets, POLYS.
And it only the beginning, I hope. :cool:
Earlier suggested to lead tournament, that a command at a command.
The dream comes true! :)
I shall play for USSR.
Where will familiarize with rules?
Ah Ulf
You have awakened a monster now. I see this spinning into a fully fledged tournament. This could get big.:smg:very easy to set up. let me know if you require any assistance if you deciede on a tournament.:)
I don't see tournament serving the purpose here. It's better to have several different battles fought at the same time than to fight the same battle several times.
Better different battles made on the basis of operational planning.:cool:
The winner will be defined by quantity of the put loss in fights SP.
Or if all as should be thought over by rules of campaign and structure of forces then who will reach the purpose of campaign even if some fights will be lost. ;)
hi ulf
if you have room for a newbie whos got the bug
i would love to participate it sounds like a lot of fun:)