Questions about Headquarters

[Mit Sigel]

As far as HQs at Bn level in a more Strategic level game as in PzC i dont see a need. HQs serve a purpose and besides that purpose they dont provide much else except more units to move around, keeping unit density down is always a good thing. Adding HQs to Bns in bigger Scenarios you could be adding 100s of units to the map.

Now PzB on the other hand, a more Operational level game Bn HQs would work better.

Just my thought

In the Pacific attached units might not see their parent HQ for weeks, or months, at a time. So I'm really only talking about the infantry regiment battalions, and maybe a few engineer combat battalions.

I haven't lawyered up on the manuals yet. But I get a general sense that HQ's provide some benefit to morale and supply. So not entirely inconsequential on the face of it. But they don't seem to confer a benefit to combined arms operations.