HPS PzC II

[dgk196]

Hello...

I wholeheartedly agree with you on that one! Could be that its because the game doesn't look at the aspects of what a command can do, or should be doing, and how efficient they are at it.

For instance, having the various categories of what a 'command' does might help!? Such things as a 'rating' for each of the following...

Commanding Officer, Executive Officer, Chief of Staff, Supply, Artillery, Communications, Intelligence and the various Liaison officers of the 'command in question' and those of the 'supporting units!?

By assigning a 'value' to each of these categories you could derive an overall efficiency rating for the 'command' and each of its units. This would give you the ability to determine the units ability to perform both their individual tasks and those that take coordination to accomplish. The 'ratings' could be numeric (my preference) or an alphabetic association (A,B...) as it is now.

Ideas?

Dennis