Planning Maps - setting priorities

Poll: Which SB Planning Maps should focus on? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Vietnam	11.76%	2	11.76%
Tour of Duty	5.88%	1	5.88%
Proud and the Few	5.88%	1	5.88%
Eagles Strike	11.76%	2	11.76%
Korean War	11.76%	2	11.76%
Advance of Reich	5.88%	1	5.88%
Pacific War	11.76%	2	11.76%
Winter War	0%	0	0%
Red Victory	35.29%	6	35.29%
Total		17 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

[Show Results]

Thread Modes

Planning Maps - setting priorities

06-07-2011, 01:28 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-07-2011, 01:33 PM by -72-.)

-72-

Webmaster SDC

Posts: 718
Joined: May 2004

Planning Maps - setting priorities

I wanted to give the larger playing community the choice of which sets I give priority to.

With that in mind, I will list the 9 that I still have substantial work to do in this regard below, and will go based upon what the community wants.

I may post this over at Wargamer.com as well as Gamesquad.com's applicable threads, however I recognise the robustness of the SB community here -so will start here.

Please note, that I will automatically be giving priority to new titles as they come out (noting that Rich Hamilton has alluded to the fact that one is nearly ready over on Wargamer.com ).

Also a follow-up question; so far I have not bothered with doing screen shots of maps that are about 9 kb or smaller ( there are a lot of 1 kb maps that basically amount to a single screen shot -and even then not a full screen in many cases).

Would the community find any value in adding these to the mix as I do maps? Or should I just focus on the larger maps?

**Note: the poll allows for multiple choices, which is good- if you choose more than one, please let me know a preferred order via posting ( say your top 3 ).

Also note, that I have done the maps for DBP, SAW, MW, and SCW so far (although I still have to updated those titles' respective titles in order to link to the full sized maps).

Thx,

Steve :)

Bydand