• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Original OOB or McNamara OOB - Which is best?
10-11-2006, 01:05 PM,
#11
RE: Original OOB or McNamara OOB - Which is best?
Well, I disagree about artillery effectiveness vs. armor. Yes, artillery can be effective by knocking off a track, or something like that, but not only are the changes in line with McNamara's db but also with my personal experience. I don't know a single tank commander that would just sit through an artillery strike, you would simply button up and haul ass through it (or displace). That said, the number of vehicles disabled by artillery would actually be quite low because of most of the time it would be against a moving target.

I am of course speaking of WW2 era artillery, not DPICM or any modern type stuff like that. HE artillery versus armor is not that effective despite popular opinion. So the result I am happy with. But really, we are only talking about the low 105mm guns, the 150 and up are still some what effective versus armor.
Send this user an email
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Original OOB or McNamara OOB - Which is best? - by Volcano Man - 10-11-2006, 01:05 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)