| 
				A few infantry-related questions 
				 
					Guys, I'm curious about some details regarding how infantry units work in the JTCS.  Here goes. 
 
1.  When units try to dig-in, do they have the same chance to create an IP regardless of terrain?  It would logical for this to be so. 
 
1a. Do all non-engineers have the same chance to dig in?  I.E., to SS Panzergenadiers have a better chance than Russian cavalry infantry to create IP's per turn? 
 
1b. Do infantry units with more strength points have a better chance to create IP's than low-sp units? 
 
2. I like the new minelayer engineers, but I disagree that they can only lay one mine, and then they become useless.  I would think a better solution is to make the unit go low ammo when it makes a minefield, but can lay another field as soon as it recovers from low-ammo status.  I would think that a vehicle of some type should be used to facilitate the creating of multiple minefields for a given minelayer platoon, but I was not sure if this could be coded into the game.  
 
In short, the minelayer platoon badly needs to have the ability to make multiple minefields - though at a fairly slow rate (one every 2+ turns).  Is there any chance these minelayers will be improved in the future?  And what do you, my fellow wargamers, think about such a change? 
 
3. I really like the construction engineers, but in my opinion their chance to make a block or a trench needs to be upped somewhat.  Six failures in a row is kinda annoying, and in short scenarios, a potential game killer.  Anyone know what the percentage chance is that construction engineers can make field works in a given turn? 
 
3a. Do construction engineers with more strength points (sp's) have a greater chance to make something, compared to a low-strength platoon?  If so, by about how much? 
 
4. Shouldn't low strength or specialized anti-infantry infantry (snipers) have a chance of NOT becoming spotted when they fire, in a way similar to smaller-caliber AT guns (and for the exact same reason)? 
 
5. I have noticed that early war German engineers have a very high anti-armor attack, whilst other nations engineers often have a weak anti armor attack even later in the war.  Why are german engineers so powerful in this regard?  Should we consider a German engineer that has a weak attack vs. armor until  panzershrecks became available? 
 
Comments?
				 
				
				
Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.  
 
Sun Tzu
 
				
				
				 
			 |