(01-30-2010, 09:42 AM)Montana Grizz Wrote: I enjoy playing a "test" scenario against the designer.
We jointly critique the game as we proceed through it.
If I make a major error in tactic or strategy, it is obvious to the designer and taken into consideration when evaluating the balance.
I realize that the designer may not want to play his scenario versus 20 different people, but I do believe he should be involved in a number of those tests.
I've played scenario's rated slightly pro Axis by the designer while others rated it moderate to significantly pro Allies? What's with this?
I usually look at player names and accept the opinions of the better players.
Just some observations.
Pat
Pat,
I agree with what you said. If the designer plays a lot of different people he's bound to get many different games from the same scenario?? No 2 people will play it the same so this way he sees it from many different perspectives and routes of attack and defense.
Chuck