Change of Personnel in the H2H Section

[Montana Grizz]

I enjoy playing a "test" scenario against the designer.

We jointly critique the game as we proceed through it.

If I make a major error in tactic or strategy, it is obvious to the designer and taken into consideration when evaluating the balance.

I realize that the designer may not want to play his scenario versus 20 different people, but I do believe he should be involved in a number of those tests.

I've played scenario's rated slightly pro Axis by the designer while others rated it moderate to significantly pro Allies? What's with this?

I usually look at player names and accept the opinions of the better players.

Just some observations.

Pat