• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85
12-14-2008, 11:43 PM,
#65
RE: NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85
Thanks again. Would JGK be this unit's military acronym or would it be something different? Do you have information on actual strength in 1985, sub-units?

I'd overlooked D/23 SAS, but interestingly it's not used in the grand scenario. What I'm asking myself is how stealthy/deceptional say 1-3 transport helicopters can be. And in general I see a problem with heli-borne infantry in the game having their transport helicopters at hand all the time, even for tactical movement. The longer the scenario is, the more unlikely this becomes. The only other option, as far as I can see, is to drop them by helicopter (helicopter reinforcement) and leave them to their (probably undesirable) fate as foot or motorized infantry — which is even more "unfair". It would certainly be nice to have transport helicopters as a seperate unit type, being able to load airborne infantry...
Send this user an email
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85 - by Hans Boersma - 12-14-2008, 11:43 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)