Rating scenarios without any self reflection

[Herr Straße Laufer]

I was trying, with a little levity, to point out that the scenario rating system is for the "players" of the scenarios. :)
I really can't see allowing the designers to come in and rank on the people who are answering the questions openly and honestly giving opinions. I thought the H2H development area was for that interplay? :eek1:
The questions are; how would you rate the scenario for enjoyment and balance. The addition of the comments area was for open ended comments about the players experience in the game?
If the designer wanted a full blown treatise on what made the game "good" or "bad" then that would defeat the purpose of the comments box?
If a designer wants my opinion and wishes to get an e-mail or private message that goes into detail, I can do that too!

I'm old school here. I did not care much for the change to the new rating system. It was much easier without the comment box. :stir:

Concerning Cross of Lorraine ... :chin: I lost it from both sides. My opponents got to report and comment on the scenario. :cantswim: