Rating scenarios without any self reflection

[Hawk Kriegsman]

Hawk,

It's not about praise. It's about the difference between criticism and disrespectful comments. If Ed thinks this is the way to give constructive criticism on a scenario, I have the right to bring such behaviour to attention and give us something to think about.

/H

Let me refresh you on what you said. Let us count the threats in it shall we? I will bold them for easy counting.

I must say it's really motivating to keep designing scenarios when you read some comments on scenarios. Makes one want to withdraw all scns here instantly. and like Earl, give the scn files only to those who appreciate them.

See the latest comments on "Battle of the Outposts" there for everybody to see....

Well I have no wish to hang around here any longer.

2 threats to the community at large. No where in your post is anything about scenario comment dialogue. What you said in a nutshell is:

Someone made a bad comment to me. I am leaving and taking my toys with me.

That is bad form Huib period.

If you wish to engage in scenario comment etiquette great, but threats don't go over well. They make you look bad.

And for the record Earl stopped posting scenario files because he got tired of people modifying them. It had nothing to do with people making negative comments at all.

As for me: I don't like all of your scenarios. I find some of them very tedious. Slogging through mud and flooded terrain at a snails pace is not my cup of tea. It gets boring. That being said I do like them all in terms of accuracy and maps. I will continue to play each and every one of your scenarios even the ones I don't like.

Why? Because you have my respect as a scenario designer.

That is all you can ask for from the club. Nothing more. Stop worrying about the comments. Look at the number of times your sceanios are dowloaded and played. That tells you more than anything what people think of you as a scenario designer.

Thanx!

Hawk