majog Wrote:Just a note to both Zeiss and Panther. Obviously Hawk and others are reading these postings. While everyone has a opinion and is entitled to have rightly have one, what may ultimately result from this debate is not about this game but a perception of you as an opponent and if they might want to continue to play you again in the future. As the tourney host it is within my power to issue a ruling but I feel that since we are all adults here, that disputes are best resolved between the opponents if at all possible. I believe that I gave my opinion as the scn designer of the complexity of this scn and why I designed it the way I did. I also believe the Zeiss was more than fair in offering a compromise. Panther brought this to the forum to hear different perspectives and received numerous opinions. What he works out with Zeiss is a choice between the 2 of them unless they cannot reach agreement then it falls to me as the host. I do not believe it is in their best interest to insert ourselves into that choice but rather just judge their discussion and action and decide from there whether we deem them a worthy opponent in the future.
Just my 2 cents.
My point here majog is that Panther is out of line here calling foul. zeiss did a strategy totally in keeping with the rules of the club and within the parameters of the scenario. Why should zeiss even have to be in a position of having to replay a turn when he did nothing wrong?
Also this is in a tourney. Allowing a replay because one player is upset because he was out played sets a bad precedent for future tournament games. It opens a Pandora's Box of trouble in my opinion.
Also if Panther did not want to be judged and the like he should havee handled this off line between himself, zeiss and you.
He put it out in the public eye and the public has every right to comment as they see fit.
Thanx!
Hawk
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
