Germany- BAOR 1990 - Century of Warfare, TOAW III, and TOAW IV
3 - 0 - 2
| Rating: | 7.8 (3) |
| Games Played: | 5 |
| SM: | 2 |
| Turns: | 28 |
| Type: | Custom |
| First Side: | Warsaw Pact |
| Second Side: | NATO |
| Player Voting Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| Member | Balance | Enjoyment |
 Heldenkaiser |
Slightly Pro NATO | 2 |
 Fulcrum |
Well Balanced | 5 |
 Raven07 |
Well Balanced | 6 |
| Gaming Records | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Side Player | 2nd Side Player | Result | Score | ||||||
|
 |
Macdonald74 | vs. | Marw |  |
|
Warsaw Pact Substantial Victory | 18 | 6 |
|
 |
Three63 | vs. | Raven07 |  |
|
Warsaw Pact Substantial Loss | 6 | 18 |
|
 |
Fulcrum | vs. | Korowiow (CSTO) |  |
|
Warsaw Pact Overwhelming Victory | 22 | 4 |
|
|
Korowiow (CSTO) | vs. | Fulcrum | |
|
Warsaw Pact Overwhelming Victory | 22 | 4 |
|
 |
Bidermann | vs. | Brian Wynott |  |
|
Warsaw Pact Overwhelming Loss | 4 | 22 |
I am not sure this scenario works well. Huge regiments become evaporated in combats with tiny companies, artillery seems overpowerful, encouraging "ant attacks", there are no fixed-wing aircraft and no replacements ... I am putting "slightly pro NATO" because I won, but actually I find it hard to judge this scenario.
){kind=link}