Normandy Patch Update

[Bayes]

That makes sense, ComradeP.

BTW. As a follow up to my previous post...

I did some experiments to better understand how things work and the rules on page 74 and page 90 of the Panzer Battles user manual. (When it comes to disruption)

As far as I can see, the Disruption Check is a two step procedure. Step one is described on page 90, and step two is described on page 74. Both checks must fail before a disruption occurs.

I believed my experiments confirm this, and also that they confirm that the Company factor described on page 90 is value 15 in Panzer Battles and value 5 in Panzer Campaigns.

In the experiments, I performed 100 attacks against one company, so it is unlikely that the match between the formulas in the user manual and the experiments is random coincidence.

In Panzer Battles, I got 3 disruptions, while in Panzer Campaigns the corresponding number would be 9.

On average I get 2.3 times as many disruptions in Panzer Campaigns compared to Panzer Battles (with no fatigue).

I really enjoy the game and this is just a small thing, but I hope you can try out the following factors, to increase the number of disruptions to the same level as Panzer Campaigns:

1 for squad and uncombined platoon units.
3 for combined platoon units consisting of 2 subunits.
5 for companies and combined platoon units consisting of 3 or more subunits.

or something similar (cf. page 90). But I may of course be wrong. One reason I think something needs to be done was the difficulty I had in disrupting the American defenders in the Panzer Lehr attacks scenario :-)