HPS PzC II

[dgk196]

Hello...

I agree with you on that one. The detail level looks good, but the 'geometry' problem is not something I would have expected. The squashed hex-shapes, not really acceptable, eh?

For PzC II...

On map 'air-units'. 'Air Organizations' should have their associated units on the map, when necessary. Also, the air-units should be able to 'fly' various mission-types. Such as patrol, interdiction, close support, escort and so on.

Artillery Options. Artillery units should be able, when enabled, to use various artillery tactics. Such as concentrations, convergence, divergence, sweeping barrage, walking barrage, suppression. Indirect fire should be able to single out a target in a hex.

Attack Types. The attacking and defending units should have various attack and defense options. Such as limit losses, all out attack, retreat when a loss-level or result type is incurred or an odds ratio is reached of attack factors vs. defense factors.

Disruption. The effects of disruption should be cumulative as to the ability of a unit to effectively conduct an attack or defense. A change from the 'digital' all or nothing effect of the current disruption. I've had whole units 'disrupted' over the loss of one person in a 400+ person organization! So, the ability of units to handle disruptive situations should be more like the percentage of losses of a unit. It doesn't have to be the same as the percentage of unit losses, just some percentage reduction of effectiveness on attack or defense. The level could be tied to the 'quality' rating of the unit. A = best, F = worst. Recovery from disruption could be a units leadership to 'rally' a unit. Many possible variables here, with much room for improvement.

Idea's?

Dennis