(06-10-2012, 06:04 PM)PawelM Wrote: If no one at blitz takes points seriously-as per all posts- and thinks good player is decided by ELO and win ratio, then what is the point of crowning the champion based on points in the ladder? :)
Is that an intent to have a 'competition' for a champion based on the criterion everyone claims is meaningless? And if it is so meaningless why everone thinks testers will be attracted by this meaningless reward?
Your premise is wrong. Re-read my Post #4 and other posts in this thread. Note, not everyone believes the awarding of points for other club activities is meaningless?
I believe the Blitz is a stronger and better club than many... for the sole reason we do reward players for participating and giving back to our gaming community in many different ways; developing & testing H2H scenarios, writing book reviews, AAR's, and a myriad of other activities.
Here at the Blitz, the title "champion" is rewarded to many players... based on their points... and in some cases has nothing to do with how many games they have won? :1st place:
Again, as Ed and others have stated... "what's wrong with that?"
BTW... Mike (Warhorse) posted earlier in this thread and I also made several threads too... currently, there are many opportunities to give back to our community as a H2H scenario play tester? You will be rewarded points.
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
