2012 Ladder scoring has problems

[PawelM]

I will repeat that again -like mantra :)-I personally look at ELO and win ratio...
I am also in favour of point reward for testing.....

Also personally I am not bothered about the points as per Outlaw post :)

If noone at blitz takes points seriously-as per all posts- and thinks good player is decided by ELO and win ratio, then what is the point of crowning the champion based on points in the ladder? :)

Last year point champion had over hundred games with over 2500 points with win ratio over 0.5. This year leader has over 2000 with around 50 games and win ratio around 0.3........

Is that an intent to have a 'competition' for a champion based on the criterion everyone claims is meaningless? And if it is so meaningless why everone thinks testers will be attracted by this meaningless reward?

If points are meaninless scrapin champion crown for it is sensible?
if they are not maybe revision of awarded points is sensible ?

I am just playing devil's advocate here :)[/size]