Planning Maps - setting priorities

Poll: Which SB Planning Maps should focus on? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Vietnam	11.76%	2	11.76%
Tour of Duty	5.88%	1	5.88%
Proud and the Few	5.88%	1	5.88%
Eagles Strike	11.76%	2	11.76%
Korean War	11.76%	2	11.76%
Advance of Reich	5.88%	1	5.88%
Pacific War	11.76%	2	11.76%
Winter War	0%	0	0%
Red Victory	35.29%	6	35.29%
Total		17 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

[Show Results]

Thread Modes

Planning Maps - setting priorities

06-08-2011, 10:08 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-11-2011, 02:13 PM by -72-.)

-72-

Webmaster SDC

Posts: 718
Joined: May 2004

RE: Planning Maps - setting priorities

(06-07-2011, 11:19 PM)TheBigRedOne Wrote: Based on popularity alone, RV and MW should probably be done first. These are the two titles that book the most games here.

I would be willing to make these available to the community through Task Force Echo Four as well. Between your site and that one, it would give a large amount of coverage to the SB world. Just a thought.

Alan: sent you an email at your Yahoo address - sounds good to me...

And I should have left RV off the list, as that is the obvious next choice (since it is the newest title I hadn't done).

It also should be noted that there is a bit of crossover from some of the titles - for example, there is a Stalingrad map in RV as well as AoR, although I didn't check the date stamp and assumed they are the same one - others include ones like Balta and I think Borisov, etc -so basically doing those is killing 2 birds type of thing.

Anyways - will get to RV next (with a possible time out to do the next SB project that Mr Hamilton referred to -these have a fairly quick turnaround time), but am interested in what after that the community might be interested in.

Bydand