Jason Petho Wrote:mwest Wrote:Why allow unauthorized and not play tested "modified" scenarios to become "official" stock scenarios in ver. 1.05?
Please answer the above question... thanks!
As explained above, it was oversight.
$hit happens.
Jason Petho
Perhaps you don't understand the point I'm trying to make here? :chin:
Yes, I understand that it was an "oversight." Yes, I understand that crap happens.
But why are you allowing it to continue? :chin: Rewarding the folks who are making unauthorized changes and not play testing the "modified" scenarios by allowing these altered scenarios to become "official" stock scenarios in the next release?
What is to stop this practice from continuing?
What about other possible unauthorized "modifications" to existing scenarios?
Personally; as a scenario designer, I don't want individuals to have the ability to go into my designs, make modifications, and then upload the modified scenario into the database.
NET: I don't believe that "allowing" two (or more? 
) modified versions of a scenario to exist in the Blitz Club scenario databases is the correct solution to this problem - especially when the modifications are both not authorized by the original scenario designer or play tested .
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
