Extreme assault?

[Kool Kat]

Gents:

I have "no ax to grind," agenda, or ties to Matrix Games. I'm just a fair player (but learning! :) ) as I play better and more experienced opponents. So I'm more of a casual, then hard core guy.

I come to these forums to learn from others and to expound upon CS -a game system that I enjoy and spend hours playing.

I also believe that EA has fundamentally changed assault and not for the better. I kept an open mind when EA was first introduced and intially played all my games with that option = ON to see the effect.

Well, it was the WF scenario "Unexpected" that finally tipped the scale for me. What a miserable 18 turns of a game for me... and yes, for my opponent too. Frankly; for most of the game, after some initial tactics... I simply had to fire on my opponent's exposed troops - while secure in my trenches and bunkers, with no worries of suffering ill effects from multiple enemy assaults, artillery barrages or direct fire attacks - even when surrounded for several turns.

So; yes, I have an option (thank goodness!) to turn EA = OFF and I do.

But, I believe that CS players deserve more then the two 'flavors" of assault that are currently available... and that is why I posted in this thread. My belief is that ALL CS players should be able to voice their opinions and weigh in on subjects of interest here. I'm not asking anyone to agree with me, but I believe everyone should read and try to understand others' views.

I also try to maintain a fairly "thick skin" - especially after witnessing how some folks get treated by others who have agendas on these forums!

However, I will not allow others to either "imply" or out right call my a liar without a response from me. I don't lie. What I described in an earlier post concerning the WF scenario "Unexpected" was true and my opponent can verify these facts. I know what I experienced.

So, when can CS players expect that next assault option? :smoke: