Constructive discussion

[Hawk Kriegsman]

Hawk, I maybe reading your comments in the wrong context perhaps.

You did.

You bring Ed into the debate whereas I stated I'm not taking sides.

I took no side either. No where did I state anyone was right or anyone was wrong. I brought up Ed's name up as he was one of the two principals that caused you to start this thread.

I even admit that Gordon made a controversial remark that didn't help matters for him.

As I stated.

I'm really trying to point out that the majority of views coming out in quite a few threads are those of the ''yahoo hardcore'' as you call them and it would be interesting to hear the thoughts of even the novices on the Blitz.

I agree that all should be heard at the Blitz. I never stated otherwise. As for the yahoo hardcore comment: I said that all gaming sites have them. Go look at some Dungeons and Dragons sites sometime. Makes this site very tame in comparison.

As for not entering into the debate, being classed as cowardly, I laugh loud, I've been a union chairman, a martial arts instructor and a manager in work organisations, there is nothing I'm afraid to take up Hawk.

Then my comment would not apply to you now would it?

You're possibly missing my point, the wrangling that goes on amongst 'adults' here is possibly why other 'adults' do not bother posting?

No I did not miss your point. If anyone does not post for whatever reason then I am sorry it is their own fault. Period. If they don't post because things can become heated then I am sorry IMHO they are cowardly.

I would emphasise that comment is not directed at any particular person/s so please do not infer that I am in any further posts,

Could you please direct me to the point in my post where I said that you said anything about anyone?

I'm just suggesting maybe we all look at the possible damage to the site being done here?

Peter the damage to this site was done a long time ago.

Thanx!

Hawk