NATO, WAPA and the indefensibility of LandJut in NGP and D85

[Dog Soldier]

...since the designers notes for DF 85 (rightly so) prides itself on its meticulous historical OOB research I thought: "Why not provide some inputs to make it even more accurate"? I mean; it is not likely to make the game any worse, is it?

JDR Dragoon,

It appears you have a passion for this game. You have posted a lot of data. Pretty cool. Now to address your comment about the blitz stability, this site has been around since about 1998 IIRC. It is rock solid and well maintained by a dedicated group of volunteers. The owners are very committed to keeping the blitz on the web. So do not worry.
Glad you could join us!

As to HPS making changes, that will be more a factor of how long it takes to absorb your information and if they think a change is really needed to make the game better.
HPS provides editors with the game so players can make as simple or complex a change as the player wants to. I would suggest you take this route to changing the game.

If you decide to create your own mod, either a new CG or just a sub map scenario of the area you have been discussing here, I will be glad to host your work as we do for any other member. I think it would be wise to create a smaller scenario of the Danish front with your changes and submit it to the HTH section of the blitz. It appears from this thread there are plenty of members who would help in the play testing of such a scenario. The experience of having your peers test a sceanrio design in the HTH area is quite satisfying, creating some great scenarios. The scenario would then be added to the DB here for everyone to enjoy.

Dog Soldier