The problem is not the assault rule - TheBlitz

Thread Modes

The problem is not the assault rule

11-06-2008, 07:27 AM,

#15

Jason Petho Offline

Offline

Moderator

Posts: 2,272
Joined: Jan 2001

RE: The problem is not the assault rule

Maybe Rifle platoons (or combat platoons? tanks?) have the ability to direct artillery only in their LOS?

Independant Forward Observers can direct artillery in their LOS and out of their LOS (firing by the map)?

Jason Petho

Send this user an email

Quote this message in a reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

The problem is not the assault rule - by Von Earlmann - 11-06-2008, 03:48 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-06-2008, 04:20 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Mike Abberton - 11-06-2008, 04:51 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Jason Petho - 11-06-2008, 05:02 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Kool Kat - 11-06-2008, 05:29 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Copper - 11-06-2008, 05:14 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-06-2008, 05:46 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Jason Petho - 11-06-2008, 06:08 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Herr Straße Laufer - 11-06-2008, 06:20 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Kool Kat - 11-06-2008, 06:25 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Mike Abberton - 11-06-2008, 07:14 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Kool Kat - 11-06-2008, 11:18 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by K K Rossokolski - 11-07-2008, 10:08 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Steelrain60 - 11-07-2008, 11:37 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Reddog - 11-06-2008, 06:18 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-06-2008, 06:37 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-06-2008, 07:20 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Jason Petho - 11-06-2008, 07:27 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-06-2008, 07:43 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Huib Versloot - 11-06-2008, 07:43 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by RedDevil - 11-06-2008, 10:48 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Steelrain60 - 11-06-2008, 12:40 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Mike Abberton - 11-06-2008, 01:44 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-06-2008, 12:43 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Steelrain60 - 11-06-2008, 12:44 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by K K Rossokolski - 11-06-2008, 02:38 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Kool Kat - 11-07-2008, 12:05 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Ivan - 11-06-2008, 07:11 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-07-2008, 10:54 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by John Given - 11-07-2008, 10:41 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Mike Abberton - 11-08-2008, 12:46 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by John Given - 11-08-2008, 02:04 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-08-2008, 02:52 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Mike Abberton - 11-08-2008, 04:22 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-08-2008, 04:36 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Huib Versloot - 11-08-2008, 05:27 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Mike Abberton - 11-08-2008, 05:24 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Hawk Kriegsman - 11-08-2008, 05:38 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Herr Straße Laufer - 11-08-2008, 05:47 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Jason Petho - 11-08-2008, 06:19 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Herr Straße Laufer - 11-08-2008, 07:22 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Jason Petho - 11-08-2008, 07:41 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-08-2008, 06:01 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 11-08-2008, 06:35 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Herr Straße Laufer - 11-08-2008, 07:24 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by FM WarB - 01-08-2009, 02:36 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 01-08-2009, 05:06 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Chuck10mtn - 01-08-2009, 06:02 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by FM WarB - 01-08-2009, 06:22 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by umbro - 01-08-2009, 06:23 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by FM WarB - 01-08-2009, 07:13 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by K K Rossokolski - 01-08-2009, 03:17 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Chuck10mtn - 01-09-2009, 02:41 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by K K Rossokolski - 01-09-2009, 05:28 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by FM WarB - 01-09-2009, 09:37 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Von Earlmann - 01-14-2009, 09:31 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Steelrain60 - 01-12-2009, 01:45 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by The Rattler - 01-12-2009, 04:42 PM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by K K Rossokolski - 01-13-2009, 09:06 AM

RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by FM WarB - 01-14-2009, 11:49 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.