• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


The problem is not the assault rule
11-06-2008, 06:20 AM,
#10
RE: The problem is not the assault rule
Jason Petho Wrote:
umbro Wrote:I would be very circumspect about actual forward observer units. They would add a lot of clutter to the game. Plus, how are they replaced when destroyed, etc. Further, it seems they were attached to field units in their role.

Maybe having the Company HQ (assuming Command and Control is turned on?) act as the forward observer then?

Jason Petho

Maybe have the forward observer be given the visibility status of ATR platoons/squads? If they are truly two or three men teams with a radio they should have the same capacity to hide as the ATR units?

They may still get "tripped over" by advancing enemy units but, it would give them a some semblence of survivability? And, you would then need far fewer. Plus, it would require the owner to find really good terrain for the observer?
The detractions, of the unit, may be minimalized? And, I would exempt them from having a defensive strength. If destroyed the onus would then be placed on the HQ?

Ed
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Copper - 11-06-2008, 05:14 AM
RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Herr Straße Laufer - 11-06-2008, 06:20 AM
RE: The problem is not the assault rule - by Ivan - 11-06-2008, 07:11 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)