Rating scenarios without any self reflection

[Hobbes]

Chris,

Nice thoughts. But, I think "the designer" came here and made comments already? ;)

'Cross of Lorraine' was your design?

Maybe we can start a thread titled "When Scenario Designers Attack!" :curse:
Followed by "When players offer honest opinions based on their personal preferences." :2guns: :scare:

It isn't too hard to accept a little criticism? :pullhair:

I'm not sure I understand this post so I will attempt to reply to each point.

1. Nice thoughts. But, I think "the designer" came here and made comments already? ;)

Yes but we can be defused by allowing us to vent on the ratings notes should such a thing be possible - my main response being to Huibs comments two years ago ironically (which I'm still itching to counter).

2. 'Cross of Lorraine' was your design?

Yep. eek?

3. Maybe we can start a thread titled "When Scenario Designers Attack!"

We are attacking! (but we hope meeting engagements are OK with everyone?)

4. It isn't too hard to accept a little criticism? :pullhair:

It's not hard to accept criticism. What is hard is when there is no forum to allow a response. I did respond to Huib's critic of 'Cross of Lorraine' on these forums but that is long gone - what remains is his
critic of the scenario on the ratings notes - that I would love to be able to post a response to!

Cheers, Chris