FWWC multiplayer game 2 or 3 day scenario

[Almskaar]

There's another player interested too, he's experienced but hasn't been on this forum before. We're doing a quick game to get him out of boot camp.

Since we're scrapping this overall/sub commander thing I'd like to put in my vote for a bigger scenario, say 50+ turns and happy to play either side.

Maybe give it another day or 2 to see if anyone else is interested...

[Almskaar]

Oh, and btw, I'm slow, I have 2 little kids.
If I'm commanding 4 or 5 corps it might take me a whole week to get a turn in

[Partizanka]

I got the email but had not had enough time to respond. Others have mentioned the potential issues of the proposed layered format and I see adjustments have been made. I would be interested in the multiplay if you care to expand the teams to 3 per team, but as I have mentioned to some, my playing style has changed somewhat from focusing on the win at all costs to a style of play that is more to experience the battle.

[Almskaar]

I got the email but had not had enough time to respond. Others have mentioned the potential issues of the proposed layered format and I see adjustments have been made. I would be interested in the multiplay if you care to expand the teams to 3 per team, but as I have mentioned to some, my playing style has changed somewhat from focusing on the win at all costs to a style of play that is more to experience the battle.

Happy to have you join. 

You've mentioned your playing style being different before. Could you please elaborate on that? I'm guessing one of the trickier things about these games is setting up the victory conditions to somehow keep things within the realm of historical plausibility. Assuming the designers more or less get that right it's hard for me to imagine how what you would do would be significantly different than what anyone else would do.

[Partizanka]

I got the email but had not had enough time to respond. Others have mentioned the potential issues of the proposed layered format and I see adjustments have been made. I would be interested in the multiplay if you care to expand the teams to 3 per team, but as I have mentioned to some, my playing style has changed somewhat from focusing on the win at all costs to a style of play that is more to experience the battle.

Happy to have you join. 

You've mentioned your playing style being different before. Could you please elaborate on that? I'm guessing one of the trickier things about these games is setting up the victory conditions to somehow keep things within the realm of historical plausibility. Assuming the designers more or less get that right it's hard for me to imagine how what you would do would be significantly different than what anyone else would do.

The robot check or something keeps kicking me off when I try to post. For now, let's just say I like playing less competively where all players share in the enjoyment of the play.

[Almskaar]

The robot check or something keeps kicking me off when I try to post. For now, let's just say I like playing less competively where all players share in the enjoyment of the play.

I'm with you on that

[Almskaar]

Well, seems like we've given it enough time.
I've messaged those I don't have emails for, once I've got them all I'll send out a group email.

[zhuangcheng]

Is there any vacancy left? If so, I hope to get the opportunity to participate—I own all games in the World War I series.

[Almskaar]

Is there any vacancy left? If so, I hope to get the opportunity to participate—I own all games in the World War I series.

Hi, so sorry we're full up but if someone drops out I'll message you