 |
|
Rating scenarios without any self reflection - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Campaign Series (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Thread: Rating scenarios without any self reflection (/showthread.php?tid=42792) |
RE: Rating scenarios without any self reflection - junk2drive - 10-28-2007 In the tank survival thread I commented that HTs should be easier to kill. If HTs were vulnerable there wouldn't be a debate. I would hope. Back on track, I designed a few scens and mods for Combat Mission and have playtested bunches for Steel Panthers and CM. When I learn CS better I will contribute as time allows. I always advise other designers to make things for themselves. If they then choose to share with others, fine. But don't expect accolades in return. RE: Rating scenarios without any self reflection - Herr Straße Laufer - 10-28-2007 Maybe we can add a thread called: "Designing scenarios without any self reflection"?  Where things can devolve is when a designer may simply feel the need to justify some aspect of the scenario, when a player was making a simple statement concerning enjoyment. But, if a designer wishes to make that kind of thread make sure that any criticism is for the comment and not the one who made it? ;) Pretty maps are one thing. Accurate OOB's are another. A balanced game, that can be enjoyed, is a thing of beauty. It is probably the most important thing to me. Playing from either side and still having fun is why I play some scenarios over and over (not to count the grass either). There are few out there! :thumbs_up: :chin: Halftracks! "Slowly I turn. Step by step. Inch by inch."   I don't remember anyone having a problem with halftracks. :pullhair: |
){kind=link}