![]() |
|
jason Petho - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards) +-- Forum: The Firing Line (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Campaign Series (https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Thread: jason Petho (/showthread.php?tid=77123) |
RE: jason Petho - Jason Petho - 11-02-2025 Quote:At a range of 1 hex, the SA/18 should have an attack value of 4, while the SA/38 should have an attack value of 5. Currently for the H-35 and H-39 in the unit database, this is reversed. For the R-35, there is currently no difference in hard target attack factors between the standard R-35s, and the R-35s with the SA/38. I have fixed the SA/38. P08042 5 3 2 5 4 3 2 1 I also swapped the two H-35 and H-39 values. What else do I need to fix? RE: jason Petho - Dan Caviness - 11-04-2025 (09-27-2025, 12:17 AM)Schwerpunkt75 Wrote: Jason, Herr Schwer....you need to get OUT more...lol... I thought I was the armaments resident maniac but after that sterling dissertation...I'm handing you the crown... ![]() ps: Don't get me started on the PzJag V Leopard fire tables! RE: jason Petho - Dan Caviness - 11-04-2025 (11-02-2025, 08:35 AM)Jason Petho Wrote:Quote:At a range of 1 hex, the SA/18 should have an attack value of 4, while the SA/38 should have an attack value of 5. Currently for the H-35 and H-39 in the unit database, this is reversed. For the R-35, there is currently no difference in hard target attack factors between the standard R-35s, and the R-35s with the SA/38. Well Jason...since you asked...;) RE: jason Petho - Jason Petho - 11-05-2025 Quote:Well Jason...since you asked...;) I did, I did. Now is the time for any final changes. After this, JTCS will be remastered and that's it. RE: jason Petho - Dan Caviness - 11-05-2025 Arriving very late to this party...I will apologize if the following isn't along the lines of what you're looking for. Dawags is more expert on this one than I... but he's observed that some trucks get a Defense of 2 now (ex: German and American) whereas some are still getting the old value of 1 (English, possibly the Russians). At the time it seemed like that was where it was heading, basically making all trucks a bit more survivable with the defense of 2. Trust me...they still die...and I think it was a good adjustment as far as it went. Regards, Dan RE: jason Petho - Schwerpunkt75 - 11-05-2025 (11-05-2025, 09:23 AM)Dan Caviness Wrote: Arriving very late to this party...I will apologize if the following isn't along the lines of what you're looking for. Hear, hear! RE: jason Petho - Schwerpunkt75 - 11-05-2025 I'm sure that this has been debated over the years, but the Russian SMG and Guards SMG platoons are a bit absurd. I would propose reducing the number of these platoons from five down to something more manageable, and giving them all stronger attack values at a range of one hex. RE: jason Petho - Jason Petho - 11-05-2025 Before an after values would be greatly appreciated! RE: jason Petho - Schwerpunkt75 - 11-05-2025 (11-05-2025, 01:55 PM)Jason Petho Wrote: Before an after values would be greatly appreciated! Not sure what you mean. RE: jason Petho - Jason Petho - 11-05-2025 Quote:giving them all stronger attack values at a range of one hex. Current attack values and expected attack values. |








