06-13-2015, 05:36 AM
Hello everyone,
The following question is geared to the Middle East Project I'm working on, but could also have an impact on other CS projects in the future.
If you could have a scenario that had a good map, good order of battle, a good force mixture, and an interesting mission; however, it was not all that historically accurate would you still be interested in the scenario? By mission oriented, I mean breaching a fortified line, a meeting engagement, river crossing operations, air assault operations, a combination of all of these, or a whole host of other military missions. Before starting a bunch of work, is this something that would be of interest to the Campaign Series community in general? Or, is it complete waste of time to go down the not so historically accurate path?
Take care,
Jim vK
The following question is geared to the Middle East Project I'm working on, but could also have an impact on other CS projects in the future.
If you could have a scenario that had a good map, good order of battle, a good force mixture, and an interesting mission; however, it was not all that historically accurate would you still be interested in the scenario? By mission oriented, I mean breaching a fortified line, a meeting engagement, river crossing operations, air assault operations, a combination of all of these, or a whole host of other military missions. Before starting a bunch of work, is this something that would be of interest to the Campaign Series community in general? Or, is it complete waste of time to go down the not so historically accurate path?
Take care,
Jim vK