Forums

Full Version: Looking for strong opponents winSPWW2 v4.5 and winSPMBT v5.5
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I'm back! Looking for strong opponents winSPWW2 v4.5 and winSPMBT v5.5
Important conditions:
1. 6-14 % artillery limit.
2. Avia/artillery bombarding at 0 turn are forbidden (excepting smoke screen statement).

Another conditions are widely discussing...
I can do up to 1-4 turns a day.

(E-mail in my profile is working)
(03-19-2011, 03:46 AM)Leo Wrote: [ -> ]I can play a single scenarios and PBEM campaigns.

I'm interested in getting some games going for both winSPWW2 and winSPMBT. I have the CD version for both games, all slots open except slot 000.

I have been away from PBEM gaming for a while and I'm not up to speed on the newer house rules...
wulfir
I have sent a message to your registered e-mail.
(03-19-2011, 08:21 PM)Leo Wrote: [ -> ]wulfir
I have sent a message to your registered e-mail.

Recieved and returned! Big Grin
Wulfir!!

Good to hear from you mate.. it has been indeed a while.. you'll like the CD version.. brings back some a couple of features that I missed (there actually are a few ) from SPWAW/H2H.. like using the '5' key which highlights the members of a company/platoon.. not so difficult to keep troops organized now.. and the OP-fire filter.. nice.. no parading of infantry/light armor out in front of your tanks to soak-off the op-fire.. although you do have to be careful.. some of those later ww2 years and MBT years have armored cars armed with potential tank killers.. :)

I wouldn't mind having a bash at either you or leo.. MBT (early years) or ww2..

e-mail me if you're up for it..

[email protected]

Cheers!
Greybeard
(03-20-2011, 05:15 AM)Greybeard Wrote: [ -> ]...like using the '5' key which highlights the members of a company/platoon..

I agree, the 5 key is a great thing to have! Have yet to really get to know the OP-fire filter in MBT, I'd be happy play a game or two. I'll drop you a mail...! cheers
The first post is still actual...
I have just started a Tournament. It is Warsaw Pact vs NATO set in 1975;

http://east-vs-west.type_z.fastmail.fm/fm/EvW_ver2.html

You are more then welcome to come play. I need Russian players. I am in the process of translating the Web page to Russian to try and attract more Russian players.
There are a lot of Russian MBT players and they are under-represented at the Blitz. This tourney is in part an attempt to change that.

Я как раз начинал турнир. Варшавский пакт против НАТО установленного в 1975; http://east-vs-west.type_z.fastmail.fm/fm/EvW_ver2.html Вы более после этого радушны для того чтобы прийти игра. Мне нужны русские игроки. Я в процессе переводить страницу паутины к русскому для того чтобы судить за и привлечь более русские игроки. Много русские игроки MBT и они under-represented на Blitz. Этот турнир в части попытка изменить то.
Thanks for the personal offer, low_bidder. Earlier, I already read your topic. I have two reasons to reject your offer:

1. I never played any tournaments. As I believe, such tournament will be too bulky, long and tiresome for me.
2. In case of WinSPMBT, I strongly prefer to play earlier years (1946-1962).
I too, prefer earlier years. I wanted an NATO vs PACT because I have been on the blitz much longer then my profile would indicate. I have noticed that most of the newer ( since the turn of the century) players are from former Pact nations. It seems to me SP players are drifting apart. I consider that bad.
I would hate to see the SP community go the way of "Eve". Eve is a space based Sci Fi role playing game. In it the Russians have created their own little corner of virtual space and made it Russian only. That carries Russian paranoia a little far.There needs to be one Blitz, not the Blitz and the война молнии
While Russians are paranoid, Americans are arrogant. I think the small things such as playing games together can have big results. Such as bringing us closer. So I am doing what I can to bring that about. MY very own reset button.
With the advent of modern computer based machine translators, Language shouldn't be a barrier.
I picked the mid 70's because it is the most competitive period that had a base of logic to support a tournament of this type. The 60's had a larger base since the cold war was at it's hotest. The problem with the 60's was the USA had focused it's technology on naval and air power. Frankly, the ground forces of NATO were no match for the Soviets. Soviet aviation was no match for NATO. Not even close. NO F-15 has ever been lost in air-to-air combat. the kill ration stands around 110 to zero. So a mid 60's tournament would have been people sitting there watching air strikes. Not much fun.

I designed this tournament just for guys like you. There is NO strict regime of games, no bracket, no draw, no time limits, only one rule. No obligation to play, this game or another afterwards. If you want to try something different, give it a try. Get your favorite opponent, hopefully someone that isn't a member of the blitz and get them to play you.
You don't even need a CD. Player 2 can play any game without a CD. I am comfortable with sending out the scenario files, since 90% of the units ENTER the map, so there is no advantage gained from looking at your opponents set-up., since there is no set-up. So anyone can play the game as a PBEM scenario, which is what you advertised as wanting to play.
I just stuck several scenarios together and called it a tournament.
Please don't let that word throw you.

I called it a tournament for those that like tournaments. They will compete for the prize and medals. It hangs together as a tournament because all the battles have a common theme and share a scoring system. They can still be played as a scenario.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7