Forums

Hi all!

Just curious.

Do you like a tank heavy battle or infrantry only battle?

I like variety, trying different tactics. The terrain dictates the OOB.

I like to mix it up also.
Sometimes, tanks, sometimes, infantry, some modern, some old school...as long as the is a good battle in the game, and a chance for both players to get a result...I am a happy guy.

Massive Inf only battles can get a bit boring though, especially if there is a lot of arty and z-fire.

Yeah I agree with Walrus, Can't do infantry only battles. I love tanks, but need a few foot sloggers round for defence. Go the TIGER. ;)

Without any knowledge of the multitude of variables of the battle field I would go with infantry heavy with tank support.

Like Vesku said think you have missed the most common types
Infantry heavy with tank support
or
Both roughly equal.

Depends on terrain unless doing a campaign of course.

(09-26-2010, 03:14 PM)Imp Wrote: [ -> ]Like Vesku said think you have missed the most common types
Infantry heavy with tank support
or
Both roughly equal.

Depends on terrain unless doing a campaign of course.

I left out the other options by purpose to get the left and right opinions .

Should asked "if you had to chose"

Silly poll as it seems i guess.

For me it would be the latter.

Infantry if I can't choose combined arms. I prefer tough over fast. Although both is better.
Fast means I make my mistakes at a higher rate of speed. That is seldom a good thing.

And on a large map in a meeting engagement setting.

Actually; close would be the one word answer. i would rather lose a close game then win in a slaughter. Most players will quit when getting slaughtered, not that I blame them.
It's not much fun watching your troops go the way of a snowman (exp 10, mor 10) facing a flame thrower (HE 40, range 2).