Forums

I've asked a few guys, but it appears they're not interested.

OK, no problem, Antoni stepped forward to defend the GBR colours!

Owl

(08-21-2010, 09:15 PM)OWL Wrote: [ -> ]CM Pre-Olympic Tournament (starts 01/10/2010 and ends 31/12/2010)

2 players fight for their country in one team.
Multiple teams per country are welcome: USA 1, USA 2 etc
2 dedicated Autumn scenarios:
Scenario I: Allies attack on dynamic flag (CMAK Sept 1944)
Scenario II: Axis attack with exit zone (CMBB Sept 1942)
Each team fights 2 other teams and for each player 4 battles, for example team GBR 1:

Scenario I
GBR1 player A* attacks vs USA 1 player A
GBR1 player A defense vs USA 1 player B*
GBR1 player B* attacks vs USA 1 player B
GBR1 player B defense vs USA player A*

Scenario II
GBR1 player A* attacks vs FRA player A
GBR1 player A defense vs FRA player B*
GBR1 player B* attacks vs FRA player B
GBR1 player B defense vs FRA player A*

So, each teamplayer plays 2 battles. One as attacker and one as defender. The battles are not played by the two teamplayers together as a team. Right ?

Each player plays 4 battles!

2x CMBB ( 1x attacker and 1x defender)
2x CMAK ( 1x attacker and 1x defender)

Each team also 8 battles.

greets OWL

(09-07-2010, 03:26 AM)OWL Wrote: [ -> ]Each player plays 4 battles!

2x CMBB ( 1x attacker and 1x defender)
2x CMAK ( 1x attacker and 1x defender)

Each team also 8 battles.

greets OWL

------------
OK, I'll be the one to bring up the 800 pound gorilla.
FOUR BATTLES per player!? That's an awful lot for a tournament.
How about TWO battles per player?
Players determine which side of both scenarios they wish to play?
Guys?

(09-07-2010, 06:21 AM)mTk(FGM) Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-07-2010, 03:26 AM)OWL Wrote: [ -> ]Each player plays 4 battles!

2x CMBB ( 1x attacker and 1x defender)
2x CMAK ( 1x attacker and 1x defender)

Each team also 8 battles.

greets OWL

------------
OK, I'll be the one to bring up the 800 pound gorilla.
FOUR BATTLES per player!? That's an awful lot for a tournament.
How about TWO battles per player?
Players determine which side of both scenarios they wish to play?
Guys?

I'm with mTk. Four battles at the same time is a lot, but the battles are big as well. Wil consume a lot of time...

(09-07-2010, 07:06 PM)Bert Blitzkrieg Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-07-2010, 06:21 AM)mTk(FGM) Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-07-2010, 03:26 AM)OWL Wrote: [ -> ]Each player plays 4 battles!

2x CMBB ( 1x attacker and 1x defender)
2x CMAK ( 1x attacker and 1x defender)

Each team also 8 battles.

greets OWL

------------
OK, I'll be the one to bring up the 800 pound gorilla.
FOUR BATTLES per player!? That's an awful lot for a tournament.
How about TWO battles per player?
Players determine which side of both scenarios they wish to play?
Guys?

I'm with mTk. Four battles at the same time is a lot, but the battles are big as well. Wil consume a lot of time...

Why must there be two entirely different scenarios?
How about this first round we fight the CMAK scenario, mirrored (2 files), then the next round we can play the other CMBB scen.

The CMAK scenario is a 3K, 40+ turn Biggun'... Turn rates are bound to lag a bit anyways... Keep the CMBB scen in reserve I think.

I bow to Mikey's logic.

The idea presented about playing as a team is nice. Divide the forces among two team players and there you go. Once the team plays as an attacker and once as a defender. Not a bad idea.

The original deadline was 31 December - if we break it up as suggested above, could we make the first scenario deadline 31 October, and the second one 31 December? That way we keep the original timeline that Owl was hoping for.