Walrus Wrote:Weasel Wrote:Cool medal. I am just thinking about the work load I would have to take on, and if I could do it. I am not the most imaginative person for things like this when it comes to writing, but maybe I could entice my cohort to do it.
I assume that you mean me!
My schedule is all over the place now I have lost my usual gig of the last two years.
I could have plenty of time to write something...or none at all.
No idea at the moment...though having no time to write means I am making enough money to pay my rent, generally a good thing eh.
Therefore I would be reluctant to take something like that on. I would hate to disappoint.
YOU'RE FIRED
LOL It's heart warming to see your close relationships.
Wigam Wrote:I choice for the 1st one would be a straight out 1 vs 2 if they agreed of course.
Sort the ladder by ELO and you'll get better matches because the total score only tells you how active the player is, nothing about the skill.
Vesku Wrote:Wigam Wrote:I choice for the 1st one would be a straight out 1 vs 2 if they agreed of course.
Sort the ladder by ELO and you'll get better matches because the total score only tells you how active the player is, nothing about the skill.
Is that a shot a me? :eek1:
Oh yeah, your 70% win ratio truly sucks.
Well, anything but points and played games drop me from the top spot.
Thats part of it though. Having the true top of the ladder challenge, a ELO leader challenge there are a few ways of doing it.
So if Chris agrees I will start working on the first one. :)
Ok, finally made it all the way through the CM battle (more or less). I must admit I was reading with anticipation Red Devil's flanking movement. Such a brilliant move for a single marder.
I would suggest the moderator set up the map and units using standard point ratios myself. I would also suggest going in two or three turn blocks so things are easier to follow, that is unless something dramatic occurs.
If you want to do the first go ahead, or I can do it, all good by me.
Thanks for suggesting this.
