Forums

I would like to congratulate Rune (JDR Dragoon) on his first scenario passing through testing and onto the OpS H2H approved list! :)

H2H-850610_30sd_AFNorthHTH_MOD V1.2
This scenario zipfile contains a variant of the stock "850610_30sc_AFNorthHTH" scenario and the files necessary to play it. More details in the thread below and in the README file in the .Doc file.

https://www.theblitz.club/message_boards...#pid278335

The files are all "zipped" for your convenience. The variant put up for playtest here is the one entitled "Variant 1.2" in the above thread.

Variant 1.1 adds 3 additional supply counters for the WAPA side and speeds up their arrival somewhat.

Variant 1.2 juggles the initial setup some more, and speeds up the arrival of WAPA supply even further.

This is the second MC scenario to be added to the list, both scenarios can be played and reported on the ladder just as any other stock scenario.

So click this link Approved scenario list to download this or any other scenario on the Approved scenario list. ;)

Thanks.

Why you should play this:

-It is a relatively minor scenario featuring 1 Corps on the NATO side and 2 WAPA armies. It is thus possible to play over the course of about a month of daily email exchanges.

-It features a lot of different units from different countries with varying capabilities and levels of experience. This scenario literally has everything!

-It features a more accurate NATO OOB than the stock DF85 game, an OOB which better reflects the operational conditions on the Jutland peninsula.

-It features amphibious and airborne reinforcemnts for both sides!

-You get to fight over a peice of unique terrain (a peninsula) which presents unique operational and tactical challenges for both the attacker and defender.


Why you should not play this scenario:

-Since I decided to stick as close to the stock DF85 scenario as possible WAPA still has units available that would have been earmarked for other theatres (most notably the danish isles partially visible in the NE corner of the map). It is therefore necessary to play the game with some mandatory Optional Rules in effect in order to affect a pro-NATO balancing, most notably "Artillery Setup" and "Explicit Supply". If you do not like these optional rules this scenario might not be for you ;)

Thanks to Kuriltai and Varjager for helping with the testing. The next scenario variant I post for playtesting should do away with the mandatory "Optional Rules" :)