A little poll to see what the concensus is.
Rob
LOL! I guess we will see how many Beta testers and Matrix employees are registered to the forums? ;)
I made this a sticky thread to keep it up high.
Well I haven't run in to any glitches yet!
But I see the difference in the assaults..takes more to move the enemy!
What I have a problem with is it changes the balance of a lot of the
scn.:angry:
Defender definetly has the advantage now!..need to make the optional rule avaliable!
Relayer
Relayer Wrote:What I have a problem with is it changes the balance of a lot of the
scn.:angry:
Defender definetly has the advantage now!..need to make the optional rule avaliable!
Relayer
I am of the same opinion. Not a big fan of the change.
Gavin
I refuse to believe that the people who are voting to keep the V103 assault rules are even remotely informed or aware of how it affects the game,plz if you dont know what this is about dont vote.and yes im entitled to my opinion on this.RAUS
RAUS wrote
Quote:I refuse to believe that the people who are voting to keep the V103 assault rules are even remotely informed or aware of how it affects the game,plz if you dont know what this is about dont vote.and yes im entitled to my opinion on this.RAUS
[/quote]
I am aware of how this change affects the game and I think that the new assault rules can make the game better. The old assault rules were garbage and IMHO unrealistic but with some tweaking of the new rules I see a great improvement. I have seen some people complain that the new rules will unbalance scenarios but since almost all of the scenarios are not balanced I don't see a problem. Also I am not a member of the Beta Brigade or an employee of Matrix
I am in agreement that the new rules could make the game better but nneed serious tweaking,i vote whole heartadly for the compramise.
junk2drive Wrote:Silkster53 Wrote:LOL! I guess we will see how many Beta testers and Matrix employees are registered to the forums? ;)
I made this a sticky thread to keep it up high.
:conf:
Yes, Beta testers and Matrix game developers who have not recorded any ladder results in the past six months to a year, and/or who are not active members of the CS ladder but are registered to the CS forum.
They have a vested interest in padding the polling but not in the ladder or reported games?
C'mon, no reason to be confused. I can name all the names if you wish and then have them checked by a "supermoderator" to see who voted for what.
Take away my vote and the votes of all the others who may be partial and we may have a poll that means something.
At the moment it is interesting that the majority want something other than the old or the new way.
What will the Matrix developers do then? :chin:
Time will tell?
I removed CS from my ladder list. Therefore, I didn't vote. (but you can check if you like)