Just now, I attempted to report a WF game that both I and my opponenent thought was absolutely awful. I tried to give it the minimum rating, Came up with a syntax error. Tried again -same same. Left it blank -OK. Trouble was -three game results loggged ( Have subsequently deleted two of them. I don't know much about computers, but am pretty sure that shouldn't happen.
Cheers
KKR
... and I was his opponent and yes it was awful!
As an aside what's the protocol in modifying someone else's scenario? I can see what he wanted to do, and with work it could be turned in to a pretty good game. It's almost unplayable in it's current format but by the same token the chap who's done it has put in an awful lot of work it'd be a shame to see it go to waste.
I have just checked it and reported game without any probs :conf:
I tried report one with ratings, the other without any... unless somebody else was dealing with that...
Slawek
Periander Wrote:... and I was his opponent and yes it was awful!
As an aside what's the protocol in modifying someone else's scenario? I can see what he wanted to do, and with work it could be turned in to a pretty good game. It's almost unplayable in it's current format but by the same token the chap who's done it has put in an awful lot of work it'd be a shame to see it go to waste.
The scope of that battle could be interesting. The map however needs a total remake. The area of Breda doesn't look one bit like in this scn and it's off scale too if I remember well.
Anyhow perhaps some future map work can include this area. In my previous work I already have WF maps of some of that area (Woensdrecht, Bergen op Zoom etc.) A 1944 scn about the Polish liberation of Breda would also fit in this area, but I think Breda was taken without a fight. The area also borders a large (what if) WF scn that is under construction dealing with "Fall Braun" (The German push towards antwerp from the north in support of the Ardennes offensive).
It would probably turn in to a "remake from scratch".
Huib